2 July

DFW Servant Leadership Community Survey now open for responses

We’ve posted a survey to learn how our Servant Leader Community can be most helpful to people in this area who are also on the servant leadership journey. Below is the message that went out to our current mailing list and to local area attendees of the 2007 Greenleaf Conference in Dallas. If you didn’t receive this message but would like to respond to the survey, please follow this link:
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=VnoJpBE3vuN8yWsseBHMjQ_3d_3d

DFW Servant Leaders – Growing Community

Inspired by the 2007 Greenleaf Servant Leadership Conference in Dallas, we have been gathering members and momentum and now are seeking to share our journey. Thanks to the work of friends like Jack Lowe, Ann McGee-Cooper, John Casey, and many others, the DFW metroplex already has hundreds, if not thousands, of Servant Leaders, ranging from long-time practitioners to those of us who would be.

Our goal is to connect and support groups and individuals, promoting the awareness and practice of Servant Leadership in the DFW community. We have begun the process to incorporate and file as a 501c3 tax-exempt organization. We will be affiliated as a chapter of the Greenleaf Center. All of us are all busy “enjoying” our current professional and personal obligations and do not want to add to the noise, yet we are drawn to be part of something that we know can be world-changing.

If you’re at all interested in helping and being a part of this endeavor, now is the time. We ask that you click on the link below and complete a brief survey (21 questions) to help us serve our community as we plan activities that will best meet your needs.

http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=VnoJpBE3vuN8yWsseBHMjQ_3d_3d

Thanks in advance for your help and support!
Ben Dilla, Ph.D.
Organizing Committee
DFW Servant Leaders
Growing Community
www.dfwservantleaders.com

13 May

Recap from Michael Vangeli

THANK YOU, MICHAEL!!

DFW Servant Leader Community Meeting 5/1/08

A Brief Note

On May 1, 2008 we met for the second time on the campus of Southern Methodist University to discuss servant leadership and formalizing our group. The group shared their varied backgrounds and how they relate servant leadership to their various businesses. While other organizations exist within the DFW area one of the unique aspects of our group is the diversity and its egalitarian nature which is cherished and will be nurtured as we put down roots in the community.

A steering committee will meet on May 17, 2008 to develop the core needs of the community. Any interested parties are welcome to attend. Please RSVP with Suzanne Hoenig if you are able to attend. This will be a 4-6 hour meeting that will tackle some of the organizational needs we discussed in the meeting on the 1st of May and it will also identify sub-committee groups needed to complete some items. Topics for discussion range from organization structure, affiliation, fundraising, dues, survey, a mission statement, etc.

All are agreed on need for this type of group in the DFW area and everyone in attendance will be needed to ensure its sustainability. We as founding members will need to be diligent and consistent in our efforts to create a solid foundation for future members to build upon. We are responsible for our success in our community and the role it creates in our sphere of influence.

13 May

Max Toy Comments

THANK YOU, MAX!! Well-said.

Suzanne,

Thank you for the invitation to attend and comment. It is exciting to see such a diversified group have such a strong interest in the topic.

Servant leadership is both an effective lifestyle and an effective tool. The group and the meeting reflected both of these.

I think that the next steps, defining vision, mission, and goals are a critical next step. A diverse group, with good intentions must have a clear definition of where it is heading, how it intends to get there, and some measured activities to ensure success.

Upon completion of these activities, the shape of the organization will more clearly define the roles of the participants, the value-add that can be delivered, and the target that the organization intends to serve. While the principals and benefits of servant leadership are designed for all levels and types of an organization, this group probably should seek to focus upon meeting the needs of a specific type of leader. For example, a business executive coming to change the culture of his business, may find it “cute” that a fifth grader is leading the meeting, but it may not generate a sense of criticality for the need to change his management methodologies and practice. On the other hand, an organization that focuses upon the development of young leaders could have a resounding impact upon the world that they encounter. Initially, I believe that the group’s focus should capture the vision for a broad future, but gain early success in a narrow pathway.

I hope that as you read my thoughts you do not perceive them to be critical, rather an encouragement to quickly define who and what you are.

I offer my thoughts just as an opinion, nothing more, and nothing less.

Thank you for your efforts, and entertaining my opinions.

Max E. Toy
972.redacted [Ed.]
“The key to success is not in predicting the rain, but in building the ark.”

12 May

Recap of May 1st meeting

What does it take to be a formal organization? Charter? Budget? 501c3 filing? Affiliation to Greenleaf? Funding strategy? Value proposition? Definition of success? How success measured? Scope? Target audience? Reach the leaders who will reach the masses OR reach the masses who will reach the leaders?

How do we best serve community? Directly, indirectly?

Agreed that training/mentoring should be inward and outbound. Giving and getting. Heavy youth involvement and growing young servant leaders.

How do we overcome the challenges/resistance/stigma to the term Servant Leadership?

Explored the strong business case for Servant Leadership.

Agreed on importance of surveying potential membership (~500 emails) for their needs.

Follows is a very loose, imperfect capturing of the dialogue. All errors are of the transcriptionist only.

HD – how do we package? How do we communicate that we want to exist?

GS – education, action, recruiting, tech

LS – learning piece so we can learn more about being a S~L~

GS – very first action to mentor kids and be mentored by them (inward/outward mentoring)

GS – concern was that all chiefs, no Indians, no tribes whereas actually this is across all cultures, hierarchies – enlightening

BD – building an organization. What does it take to be a formal organization? Charter? Budget? By-laws? Greenleaf guidelines. 501c3

PU – lessons learned from AMC (e.g., survey)

GS – Survey Committee, not to be discussed specifically by core group. To discuss, “In what areas, do we need leadership?”

MT – What’s the funding strategy? What’s the value proposition? What’s the definition of success? How defined and how measured?

(DCh – to show if we’re moving in right direction)

MT (cont) – What’s the scope? All of Texas? Or wider? Reach leaders who will reach the masses OR reach the masses who will reach the leaders? Target audience?

(GS – rather reach 3 school teachers who will reach students.)

BD – how do we best serve community? E.g. Greenleaf’s conference this summer is hosting a service project.

HD – what do we perceive needs to be? “We as a group see as need(s) we hope to meet ….”

MS – but before we do that, define what’s community?

DCa – who do we serve directly and indirectly? Rather broad scope, pool.

GS – we train leaders to go out and do service projects; pass on the concept, make it repeatable, VIRAL

TC – blending it with what’s already there, projects already existing

DCh/SMH – we are the service project. Taking S~L~ inside corporate America.

GS – sometimes in corporate America, easier to not tell them it’s S~L~ and just have them do it

DCh – Collins said we can’t call it S~L~ [Ed. Because of the baggage], so we call it Level 5. Stigma. It’s an oxymoron. We’re in business to make money.

GP – what happened at 7/11. “S~L” term is what got people excited about it. S~L~ starts with each and every one of us, with you, yourself.

HD – bring them [non-adapters] into the fold, educate them

GS – label what people are already doing; early adopters

HD – ask, “what are you doing?” à that’s S~L~

DCa – so, help people find commonality with what they’re already doing

GS – we need a tagline, a quick identifier

LS – yes, but it’s a journey, not quick

DCa – S~L~ understanding – what are the challenges/resistance? How do we overcome them? Help others understand S~L~ from their own perspective.

PU – it’s a better way to lead. People do more when they’re led by S~L~’s. It’s financially viable. We actually all want to do better and make money. Benefits of S~L~ many. But very real challenge to get past the $/stigma.

BD – S~L~ is actually a better way; makes business sense.

GS – people like mutual respect à engagement, ownership, they pay better attention, higher employee retention.

SMH – “leaderful”. Business case is important facet to me. I’ve always gotten the so-called warmer/fuzzier aspects.

DC? – [workforce is typically] protective about staying in a command and control environment; i.e. not having to take responsibility

MT – greatest benefit … shared ownership. People don’t follow people. They follow ideas.

MS – important to know your own strengths. Carry teaching through your strengths on to the kids because we’re missing a lot of talent and leadership. So, communicate strengths to people who may not know they have them.

MS – remember Quality Circles? They were successful at employee involvement.

GS – more intellectual property when you open it up.

DCh – PPT terrible for creating org charts. Look like top-down pyramids as opposed to circles or flat, where everyone is involved.

MS – make sure that everyone has a chance to lead.

DC – shared leadership responsibility. Create a template for leadership – mentoring, charitable focus, empowerment/individual strengths focus

GS – generational disconnect – cross all the disconnect. 4 people responsible for getting Millenials prepared for workforce: kid, parents, teachers, employers (us).

DCh – does this group want to be part of Greenleaf?

PU – survey really important. 500 People [approx # emails of TX-based ’07 conference attendees, to whom we’ll send survey] “Holy Cow”. The people in this room can’t possibly know what they want.

GS – always add location of meeting to the agenda.

21 April

Input from First Meeting

One vision statement
the statement is basic, short, sums it up
Always hold to this vision statement
Every action of the group supports the vision
Everyone in the organization knows the vision

Terri Slaughter

21 April

Input from those Unable to Attend

Ann McGee-Cooper:

I have been travelling and am out of town on the day of your meeting. I agree with Duane’s input. We wish you great success and thank you for leading this initiative. I believe you will find many who share this dream and will pitch in to help.

All best wishes!

Ann

My suggestion is to create some sort of survey to determine what is needed from potential attendees for an association like this. I know that several years ago, several of us tried
quarterly meetings that moved from different companies, (Jack Lowe was involved) to generate
interest in servant leadership and after a few meetings, the attendance fell off and everyone just said they were “too busy” for another meeting. Perhaps if you can get some sort of idea about frequency, time, etc. and if they want speakers, networking time, socializing, skills learning, etc. it could have a better chance of being successful. The other thing you have going for you is that there is wider knowledge about servant leadership than there was ten years ago. Ann and Gary have been successful in the Servant Leadership Learning Community with very directed efforts to specific companies.

Best of luck for your endeavor. The time could be ripe for an organization that you are proposing!

Duane Trammell
EVP, AMCA, Inc.

Kind of my first initial thoughts around servant leadership might have to do with the
development of skills to practice/exercise. Specific things to do. I think it’s good to study significant examples of servant leaders in society. I like to read about basketball and football coaches –successful ones who can balance producing championships with developing people for something beyond the sport. Players who played for Tom Landry told stories about how Landry was always teaching them principles that would extend beyond the immediate game or practice into something they’d use twenty years after retiring in running a business.

The reason I stress having things to do has to do with my sports mentality. Great coaching involves giving people specific things to do to achieve a particular purpose. It helps it go from the philosophical to the concrete/practical/experiential.

Scott Wallace

8 April

Visioning Exercises (from the first meeting)

Let us consider a few visions of our future in this organization; the near, middle distance, and far future.

In two to three years time, imagine this DFW Servant Leadership Community has:
grown in membership;
attained 501c3 not-for-profit status;
increased available funds for programs and resources;
established a presence in the DFW business community and nonprofit sector;
through its actions, has developed a moral authority,
has become a go-to place for existing and emerging leaders who are looking to reform, transform, improve, or just be supported in their journeys.

Through our work, we have attracted the attention of the Dallas Business Journal and the Dallas Morning News. Each have sent a reporter on assignment to attend one of our meetings who then asks if we might stay afterward and answer a few questions. We do, of course. We’re feeling collegial, as always; we’re enjoying each other and our precious time together; we’re glad to share our knowledge and lessons learned.

We will look at those questions in a moment.

In eight to ten years, we are continuing to receive local attention as well as national coverage and beginning to receive requests for information and visitors from overseas. Different media outlets have called, like the morning talk show circuit, maybe Oprah’s people. A few universities have sent their business school representatives to study our ways and methods, perhaps to incorporate into their MBA programs. Harvard Business Review has published a case study of our organizational team as well as several of the area companies with whom we have interacted.

Wall Street Journal calls for interviews, to know what makes us tick, because they know it is reproducible and they know their readership would surely like to reproduce this phenomena for themselves and their own organizations.

Our speakers are sought after for facilitations, keynotes, commencements. We have regular contributions published in trade magazines and business journals.

We are known as an incubator for effective, wise, proven Servant Leaders.

You have heard of Dr. Muhammed Yunus, winner of the 2006 Nobel Peace Prize for his work with microcredit lending in poverty-stricken nations that, over the course of 30 years, has raised 5 million people from poverty into sustainable productivity, with a 98% loan repayment rate.

Yunus did not start with the goal to win the Nobel Prize. Nor do we, certainly. His Grameen Foundation was a 30-year overnight success.

What will this world look like when this organization has been developing, empowering, teaching, and sharing Servant Leadership, well and successfully, for 30 years?

What will this world look like when more leaders, in every arena, are driven by service?

What impact would that make?

When the Nobel Prize selection committee comes to interview this organization, when the Wall Street Journal reporter calls, when the universities send professors, they will all want to know the same thing — how did we do it?

Much sooner, when the Dallas Business Journal sends its reporter to ask questions a few years hence, she will want to know:

How did we get here?
How did this entity become so well-respected, renowned, contributory, influential, etc., especially in such a short period of time?
What did we do?
What systems did we put in place?
What structures? What roles?
What divisions and complements of responsibilities?
What were our key insights?
What were the potential pratfalls we avoided by our careful planning?
Which best practices from our careers and professions did we bring to bear in this organization?
Which did we eschew?
How was our behavior marked? Towards each other, towards the greater community?
How did we track progress, success?

How will you answer this reporter, professor, consultant, selection committee when they ask you?

8 April

Stated Intention (at first meeting)

Our shared purpose today, our mutual interest, our intention is together to grow the awareness and practice of Servant Leadership in the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex and to build an organization to serve this powerful idea and the people who practice it, as we share our common journey.

7 April

New Google Group

Hello DFWServantLeader@gmail.com,

Congratulations: you’ve successfully created your Google Group, DFW Servant
Leaders.

Here are the essentials:

* Group name: DFW Servant Leaders

[WHERE TO FIND IT ON WEB]
* Group home page: http://groups.google.com/group/dfw-servant-leaders

If you have questions about this or any other group, please visit the Google
Groups Help Center at http://groups.google.com/support.

Enjoy your group and make us proud!

The Google Groups Team

2 April

Exciting News!

We’re delighted to announce that Kent Keith, CEO of Greenleaf Center for Servant Leadership in Indianapolis, will be joining us tomorrow evening.  We’ll ask him to say a few words about the progress of their new Indiana chapter as well as comment on his experience with other grass roots initiatives.

 

We’re equally pleased to have John Casey with us, Founder of CEO Netweavers, and will ask him to speak briefly on the Good to Great concept of L5 Leadership.

 

We look forward to seeing you all at SMU then!

 

For those of you who can’t make it, we’ll be posting our minutes to this blog sometime next week.